• Categories

  • Archives

  • Subscribe

  • Archive for September, 2010

    What “The Cost of Aging” Means Today

    Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

    “The cost of aging” used to mean failing eyesight, bodily aches and pains, and maybe the loss of your teeth; but nowadays “the cost of aging” can mean the loss of your happy marriage!

    With growing numbers of senior citizens being diagnosed with debilitating elderly illnesses, and with the cost of nursing care on the rise, more and more couples are finding that they simply can’t afford to pay for the numerous visits to the doctor, endless medical treatments, and rising cost of prescription medicines. Many seniors hope that Medicaid will help, but before you can get assistance from Medicaid you will have to spend down your own assets to almost nothing—this includes spending down any savings or retirement assets you may have.

    If you are the spouse of someone diagnosed with an illness such as Alzheimer’s or dementia you can really get the short end of the stick. As this editorial in the New York Times points out, you can put all of your financial resources toward your spouse’s care, only to find that at the end of it all you “face a bleak retirement with neither [your spouse] nor your savings.” Some seniors are discovering a dismaying truth: that if they want to keep some kind of nest-egg for themselves, one of their only options is divorce and the separation of finances that comes with it.

    This isn’t the first time the subject of divorce for financial reasons has come up. MSNBC dealt with the issue earlier this year with this segment on “Today”. But there is some good news amongst all this gloom and doom—poverty or divorce don’t have to be your only choices. If you start planning early, you can be prepared should something like this happen to you and your spouse. Long-term care insurance is one good preventative measure, or ask your estate planning attorney about other asset protection strategies you can employ.

    Aging is hard enough without having to end a happy marriage (and feel like you’re abandoning a beloved spouse) to ensure your own financial future. Please call our office to find out what your options are.

    How to Keep Your Children from Squandering Their Inheritance

    Monday, September 27th, 2010

    Most parents come into our office with one concern on their minds: protecting and providing for their children. We help these parents select loving guardians and set up solid trust or inheritance plans to ensure that their children will have everything they need. But parents often have another concern as well—how to keep their children from squandering an inheritance received too early.

    These parents want to protect their children from the potential disaster of being given too much financial obligation before they are mature enough to handle it; they want to gradually relinquish control as each child reaches the milestones which prove they are fiscally prepared. We are happy to help parents design a plan that helps them achieve this goal.

    One strategy to help a child reach financial maturity is to specify an age at which a child may be co-trustee of his or her own trust. The child can then partner with a co-trustee of the parents’ choosing; this could be a close friend of the family, a trusted financial advisor, or even a corporate trustee such as a bank. This gives the child the opportunity to get a taste of responsibility and begin making decisions, but with a safety net beneath them. When the child reaches a certain age (or alternatively, after attaining a goal such as graduation from college, or gainful employment for a specified amount of time) he or she may then become sole trustee of his or her own trust.

    Another strategy is to give the child access to the trust principle itself in gradual increments. For example, the child may receive 1/3 upon graduation from college, another 1/3 ten years later, and the remaining 1/3 ten years after that. Of course the ages and amounts are completely up to each client, but the slow distribution of assets allows the child to have a learning curve, something which makes the parents (and the child) much more comfortable.

    At our office we understand that there is no substitute for parental involvement, but we can give our clients options that can lay a strong foundation for fiscal responsibility. If you are a parent with similar concerns, contact our office for more information.

    Lapse in Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Makes Giving to Grandkids Easier Than Ever

    Friday, September 24th, 2010

    Wealthy grandparents have a unique opportunity this year to give their grandchildren gifts of substantial value without incurring any gift tax. This is a huge savings opportunity!—so why aren’t more people taking advantage of it?

    Part of the reason may be lack of awareness. Everyone knows about the Bush administration’s year-long repeal of the estate tax, but very few people seem to be aware that the Bush tax cuts included a year-long lapse of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax as well. According to this article in Reuters, “generous grandparents could give away $3.5 million without paying the [GST] tax” during 2010.

    But before you call the grandkids with the good news, consider whether or not you feel comfortable giving them such a large sum outright. If your grandkids are still young (and not yet responsible about money and finances) you may not want them having such a large sum to play with; and unfortunately, giving the gift in trust is not an option in this case. “To take full advantage of the GST tax break, assets should be transferred directly to beneficiaries and not to a trust. Money placed into a trust may lead to taxes when distributions are made later on.”

    If your grandchildren are responsible adults, and if you’ve been considering giving them a monetary gift anyway, this lapse in the generation-skipping transfer tax could be just the push you need. Talk to your attorney or financial advisor about your gift-giving options.


    Charitable Remainder Trusts: Philanthropy in Death Can Benefit You in Life

    Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

    If you have a favorite cause or charity you have probably considered leaving some money to that charity in your will. Perhaps you’ve even taken it a step further and toyed with the idea of specifying that the executor of your will set up a trust in the name of your favorite charity, rather than simply giving a one-time gift.

    If you have ever considered either of these options you may want to ask your estate planner about setting up a Charitable Remainder Trust, which, according to this Elder Law Answers article, not only supports your favorite charity after your death, it also benefits you during your lifetime.

    “A charitable remainder trust is an irrevocable trust that provides you (and possibly your spouse) with income for life. You place assets into the trust and during your lifetime you receive a set percentage from the trust. When you die, the remainder in the trust goes to the charity (or charities) of your choice.”

    The altruistic reasons for setting up a charitable remainder trust are obvious, but here are some other advantages you may not have considered:

    • Reduction of your taxable income
    • Charitable tax deduction at the time you fund the trust
    • Diversification of assets
    • Income from the trust during your lifetime

    In addition to all of these financial advantages, setting up a charitable remainder trust provides you with the opportunity to leave a family legacy and impress your values upon your children and grandchildren.

    Please remember that charitable remainder trusts are irrevocable trusts, which means once they’re done they can’t be undone, so it’s not something to take lightly.  If you are interested in creating a charitable remainder trust, call our office or talk about it with your own attorney before you take action.

    Help for Alzheimer’s Patients AND Their Caregivers

    Monday, September 20th, 2010

    Shakespeare said that old age is a return to childhood; without teeth, without voice… and in the case of Alzheimer’s patients, without memories. But if the elderly have to endure the drawbacks of childhood, shouldn’t they get some of the benefits too?

    The Family Caregiver Alliance must have thought so too, because a few times a year they sponsor a weekend sleepover in Alamo California called Camps for Caring. The program provides campers with an experience “of shared meals and stories, of activities creative and expressive, of exercise in the outdoors and of new friends and memories made over the weekend.” But the significance of the experience can go far beyond that.

    According to a recent story about Camps for Caring on NPR, although “campers typically don’t remember details of the retreat… the experience significantly lifts their mood.” In fact, “Post-camp surveys of family caregivers indicate that the ‘good feeling’ lingers, and it even can improve daily functioning.”

    Beyond being a beneficial experience for the elderly attendees, Camps for Caring provides a much-needed break for overworked caregivers, who often attend to their elderly loved one around the clock, and can quickly find themselves dangerously close to the burnout breaking point.

    Out of state residents may find it difficult to take advantage of the Camps for Caring program, but that doesn’t mean that caregivers or their elderly charges must leave themselves at the mercy of the effects of Alzheimer’s. In addition to information about Camps for Caring itself, the NPR article includes some tips from experts that can make dealing with Alzheimer’s easier on everyone. Or you can go to the Family Caregiver Alliance’s Family Care Navigator to find organizations and resources in your area.

    Those Who Hesitate Can Still Achieve the Liberation of Retirement

    Friday, September 17th, 2010

    In spite of all the advice you see out there to start saving early for your eventual retirement, we’re realistic. We know that many people—either out of choice, neglect or necessity—put off saving for their retirement, only to find themselves up against a wall of anxiety when they realize that retirement isn’t very far away. However, according to Carla Fried of CBS Money Watch, it may not be as bad as you think. In fact, according to Fried, “he who hesitates can in fact win at retirement.”

    The article suggests that due to the recent economic downturn many people are choosing to put off their retirement until they feel more secure… a feeling that may never materialize. But that hesitation can serve a purpose: It provides the opportunity to take a good look at your finances and your choices, “take a deep breath and make some smart tweaks to your plan [so] you can still pull off a successful retirement.”

    These are some of the tweaks Fried recommends:

    Put Off Your Retirement Date. At best you give yourself a few more years to bulk up your savings account, at worst you’ve eased some of the pressure on the savings you already have.

    Consider Downsizing Your Home. Moving into a more economical home not only gives you some breathing room on the monthly mortgage once you retire, but you may be able to put some of the proceeds from the sale into your savings.

    And there’s one more that isn’t included in the article, but that you won’t want to overlook:

    Talk to Your Attorney About Estate Planning. You may not expect it, but estate planning includes thinking about health care, long-term care, and how to work with the departments of Social Security and Medicaid instead of against them. Making a plan before you retire can relieve a lot of stress.

    State Of Washington Takes Action Against Retailers of DIY Legal Documents

    Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

    There has been lot of hullabaloo in the news recently about Do-It-Yourself Wills and Estate Planning, most notably a debate on Forbes.com with articles presenting The Case For Do-It-Yourself Wills and The Case Against Do-It-Yourself Wills. Well, the state of Washington just weighed in on the subject with a settlement between the Washington Office of the Attorney General and Legal Zoom, a company that offers DIY legal documents online; and the ruling leaves no question as to where the Washington Attorney General stands in his opinion:

    “’LegalZoom offers do-it-yourself legal documents online but can’t provide you with legal advice or tell you which forms to fill out,’ Attorney General Rob McKenna said.

    Under a settlement with the Attorney General’s Office, LegalZoom can’t compare its costs to attorneys’ fees unless the company clearly discloses that its service isn’t a substitute for a law firm.

    Simply selling legal forms doesn’t constitute the practice of law. LegalZoom can only provide an online form service that allows consumers to choose and complete their own legal documents, explained Consumer Protection Division Chief Doug Walsh.

    The agreement filed today in Thurston County Superior Court also prohibits LegalZoom from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, selling personal information obtained from Washington customers or misrepresenting the benefits of any estate distribution document.”

    Regardless of your existing thoughts on the subject of DIY wills and estate planning, the comments and actions of the Washington Attorney General certainly provide food for thought.

    How to Prepare for Dismaying Changes to Estate Tax Law

    Monday, September 13th, 2010

    This may seem like we’re listening to a broken record, but once again Congress’ inability to act is creating uncertainty in the estate-tax-planning world. We’re little over 3 months away from a major upheaval in the estate tax, and according to the New York Times the upcoming law is likely to cause a lot of grumbling unless Congress takes action. And it’s no wonder when the new law will mean that more families are taxed at a higher percentage:

    “The amount of each estate that is exempt from estate tax is scheduled to become $1 million in 2011 (down from $3.5 million in 2009, when the tax was last in effect). The tax on the balance is to rise to 55 percent in most cases (up from the 2009 rate of 45 percent). So now is the time to consider the various tax strategies available.”

    What this lower exemption rate really means, however, is that more families will be caught off-guard when a loved one passes away and the survivors are suddenly hit with a massive tax bill.

    That is unless families start planning now.

    The Times article mentioned above suggests that “the easiest way to reduce the tax bill is to give as much as $13,000 a year each to as many people as you like — which you can do without paying gift tax;” but when you consider how little $1 million really is (especially when the value of your home, retirement savings, etc. are all included when adding up your total assets) we’re guessing that there are a lot of people out there who are over the exemption amount, but don’t feel they can afford to go handing out $13,000 every year. Much more appealing are some of the other planning strategies suggested in the article, including:

    • “Buy a one- or two-year [life insurance] term policy to cover the tax bill if the exemption amount is only $1 million.” The policy will help your heirs cover what could be a hefty tax bill, but the policy “[could] be canceled if Congress eases your estate tax concerns;” and
    • “Create a trust.” The article suggests a GRAT (Grantor Retained Annuity Trust), which is a great tool for high-value assets that are expected to appreciate during your lifetime; but for married couples simply looking for a way to protect their children from a hefty federal estate tax down the road a Credit Shelter Trust may be a better option.

    There are a number of other ways you might be able to prepare for the coming estate tax upheaval—the best way to protect your own family is to contact an estate planning attorney and ask about your options.

    Women and Retirement: Your Money, Your Future, Your Plan

    Friday, September 10th, 2010

    You have a longer life expectancy than a man, different ideas about what constitutes risk, often work for a different pay-scale… and if you’re a woman, you likely need a different kind of retirement plan as well.

    You may think that the financial advisor recommended by your husband/father/brother will suit you just fine, but this new article in the Wall Street Journal suggests that what works financially for men doesn’t always work for women—and this includes old-school financial advisors. According to the article, when women start seriously planning for retirement, “many find that the financial-services industry is an obstacle, not an ally. In a recent Boston Consulting Group survey of women investors, respondents said they routinely feel underserved by the financial-services industry, with more than 70% expressing dissatisfaction with the service they’re getting. Among the complaints: disrespectful advisers, narrower investment choices based on the assumption that women can’t handle risks and patronizing pitches.”

    This isn’t just a case of emotional discomfort; it also hits women in the pocket-book, where it’s likely to hurt the most. “A recent survey by financial-services company MassMutual found that women’s retirement accounts were, on average, just two-thirds the size of men’s.”

    Not all of this can be blamed on financial advisors though. Women have a dangerous (if generous) tendency to put their spouses and families first, with little thought for their own financial security until it’s too late. In addition, married women often count on their husband’s retirement plan to take care of the both of them—only to find that his plan works for his life expectancy, leaving her without a plan when he’s no longer around.

    What can women do? The first thing each woman should do is have is her own retirement account, and contribute to it each month. Make sure your financial advisor recognizes your unique needs and listens to your hopes and concerns. You can plan with your partner for golden years spent together, but it’s your responsibility to save for yourself.

    Planning for the Future is Essential for Special Needs Families

    Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

    If you have a special needs child, parent, or sibling then you know that planning for the future can be overwhelming under the best of circumstances; which is why so many parents and caretakers tend to live for today, while planning for tomorrow is always put off until… well, until tomorrow. But if planning and caring for your loved one is this difficult for you, can you imagine how difficult it would be for a friend or guardian if something were to happen to you? For this reason, the importance of planning for the care of your special needs loved one cannot be overstated.

    Getting started with your planning can feel like climbing Mt. Everest at first, especially if you’re trying to navigate through government programs and federal financial aid. But as overwhelming as it can be in the beginning, with the right advisors the planning process can and should be a relieving and beneficial experience for all. The following article from CNN Money (and posted courtesy of the Special Needs Alliance) gives a few tips on how—and why—to begin planning for your special needs loved one.

    If you would like to have a secure plan for the future but aren’t sure where to begin, perhaps the best way to start is to find an attorney in your area who specializes in Special Needs planning. The laws and requirements for government aid will vary from state to state, but more importantly, there is no substitute for a knowledgeable expert who will listen to your family’s unique story and help you blaze securely into the future.